Why I'm NOT Afraid of AI:

A Senior Citizen's Perspective

AI: Useful or Risky?

Three years ago, when ChatGPT was launched, friends began forwarding alarming messages. AI would take away jobs. AI would write books. AI would become smarter than humans. Some even predicted the end of civilisation.

Curious rather than fearful, I began experimenting with AI. Since then, I have spent hundreds of hours chatting with ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot and other tools. The more I use AI, the less afraid of it I become. Familiarity has replaced fear; experience has replaced speculation.

Recently, a senior colleague asked, “Do you find AI useful? Isn’t it risky to use AI at our age?”

A few months ago, I had made a presentation on ‘AI for Senior Citizens.’ Much impressed, some of the attendees concluded that I was an AI expert—which I’m not. But I taught myself to use ChatGPT soon after its launch and gradually became acquainted with several other AI tools, some of which I now use regularly.

Vermont Book Club

No, AI has not cheated me, misled me, or exposed me to the risk of hacking or cyber fraud. In fact, it has saved me from one.

In April 2026, I received an email from Jasmine of Vermont Book Club inviting me to join a ‘Spotlight Session’ focussing on my books. She had even written a succinct, sparkling review which showed her familiarity with many, if not all, of my published books.

Where is Vermont, and why is VBC interested in my books? I wondered.

Anyway, I sent a polite reply soliciting more details. As an afterthought, I consulted ChatGPT which instantly raised a red flag.

“Be cautious, it looks like a scam to me. Jasmine’s brief review of your books is possibly AI-generated. VBC may next demand a processing fee from you.”

As predicted by AI, Jasmine’s reply came soon enough:

“Your session would be virtual, for an hour, and could you please deposit USD 110.00 towards processing fee?”

“Sorry, Jasmine. I don’t pay to join a session. But I’d be glad to make a presentation. I charge USD 500 per hour.”

Thanks, AI, for your timely alert.

AI Architect

For renovation of my father’s house at Sambalpur, I engaged a petty contractor who suggested Simpolo for the flooring—a tiles brand I hadn’t heard of. I also wished to cross-check the quantities and estimates for material and labour.

Can you please help? I asked ChatGPT.

“Sure, just share the basic details.”

I uploaded a sketch of the floor plan of the house with measurements, and the contractor’s estimates scribbled on a piece of paper.

ChatGPT floored me.

It recommended room-wise tile size, colour, estimate for premium, medium and basic quality, and prevalent rates for tiles and labour charges.

“Do you need the names of major tile dealers in Sambalpur, and their contact numbers?” it asked.

“And yes, the contractor’s estimate for quantities is inflated by about twenty percent!”

“Here is a Print-Ready sheet which you may use for your further discussion and negotiation with the contractor and the tile dealers.”

Why I’m NOT afraid of AI?

I can offer many reasons—all based on my experience of using AI over the last three years.

AI is a Tool, not my Master

Automobiles are useful. I drive my car, but haven’t forgotten how to walk. I’ve travelled on ships and boats, but haven’t quit swimming.

Decades ago, I used a Casio calculator, and now have one in my phone. But when buying vegetables, I still resort to mental math which is faster.

Happy with my Brain, no Need to Augment it with AI

I don’t intend to augment my brain by implanting AI chips; Singularity may be near, but FAR from me.

I don’t intend to upload my brain to the cloud. I don’t have the money, and there’s nothing special about it anyway.

I am a Pensioner; AI can’t Sack Me

AI cannot sack me. It cannot replace me in a profession because I no longer have one. My pension is credited to my bank account, and AI can’t stop that. Only the government can.

More seriously, AI may indeed eliminate many jobs. Young entrants to the workforce and those performing highly routine tasks may face greater disruption.

I’m the Writer; AI is an Assistant

AI helps me in finding information, summarising articles, and generating reading lists. Sometimes, it tempts me.

“Shall I provide a draft of 1,000 words for your proposed piece?”

“Thanks, but no. I’ll write my own piece.”

I’m the writer; AI is my able assistant.

I Own my Body

AI has many helpful suggestions for my health and wellbeing. Walk daily, practise yoga, pranayama and meditation, strength training on alternate days, eat a balanced diet, shun sugar and processed food, reduce salt, oil and starch.

But I do the walking, yoga and strength training; I eat the balanced diet. AI is my guide and motivator, but I’m the actor.

AI may encourage me to walk, but only I can walk.

I Trust Doctors more than Chatbots

My annual pathological report for preventive care came in a PDF which I uploaded on ChatGPT. In less than a minute, it gave me a detailed analysis of each parameter in my report, flagged the areas of concern, proposed a few easy-to-adopt lifestyle changes, and suggested further guidance from my physician.

I sent the PDF to my physician who corroborated AI’s analysis and recommendations, though in fewer words.

When my physician prescribes any new medicine, I ask AI for the pros and cons of the prescribed medication. I still follow my physician’s prescription, but with greater awareness.

Creativity comes from Lived Experience

I was born in Khuntpali, a small village near Bargarh in western Odisha, and lived there for the first eleven years of my life. I did a whole lot of things which AI can never do. Not its fault, though, for it was not yet born.

AI never climbed a mango tree nor was it forced to beat a hasty retreat owing to the army of red ants fiercely guarding their nests which happened to be near the ripe mangoes.

AI never fell from a guava tree and gasped for breath; never explored Kumka forest, climbed Bada Dongri, or swam in Palsha Jor and the Jira river.

AI never watched the Krishna Leela and Ram Leela performed in the village square.

AI never wept when the little squirrel that fell from the tree broke its leg and died despite tender nursing.

AI never fell in love.

AI never sat beside a sick parent.

Those memories, so very personal and precious, are not available to AI.

AI has Information; I have Experience, and a little Wisdom

AI knows a lot—far more facts than I can ever hope to remember.

If I ask for a quick summary of all the plays of Kalidas and Shakespeare, and compare their dramatic genius in about 2,000 words, AI would oblige instantly. But it won’t know how much I was moved by Sakuntala’s pain or King Lear’s great sorrow and mad fury caused by filial ingratitude.

Sometimes, it goofs up or hallucinates. But it never suffers anxiety and stress, which I experienced as a nine-year-old child when I first wrote a School Board examination for a scholarship. Or the joy when I aced it.

The interview where I was dumb and tongue-tied and failed, or the one where I was confident, eloquent and successful.

I learn every day from experience, mistakes, suffering, forgiveness—from Life.

AI learns from processing voluminous texts and following algorithms fed into it.

I process life’s experiences, and the books I read, with a brain which weighs a mere three pounds, and needs a little nutrition and a few litres of water a day.

AI, by contrast, consumes significant amounts of electricity and water in the data centres that power it.

I Know Enough about AI to Use it Intelligently

Fear often comes from ignorance. Humans fear the unknown as children fear going into a dark room. But unless you open the room and flip the switch, you’d never know the treasures hidden in the room.

I have experimented with ChatGPT, Bard, Gemini, Copilot, Perplexity, Claude and Meta AI. Sometimes, I’ve been disappointed; the response was silly or incorrect, or both. When I corrected the AI, it readily admitted the mistake and thanked me for it.

But most of the time, I found it useful.

During my early days of using AI, I tasked the leading AI tools to solve the Civil Services (Preliminary) Examination – General Studies Paper I. It was an intellectual exercise to compare the capabilities of ChatGPT, Bing and Bard.

In 2026, I ran the same paper again with the newer versions and obtained very different responses. I also realised that AI models are often reluctant to process all one hundred questions in a single interaction because each response consumes computing resources and costs money.

“If I buy a subscription, would you oblige?” I wondered.

Perhaps.

No, thanks. My curiosity was merely intellectual, not commercial. I’m happy with my Free Account and its usual limitations.

Till now, AI has never tried to mislead me, or tempt me to explore its dark powers since I’ve no interest in devising a new virus or an IED.

I know what AI can do—and what it cannot.

What AI has Actually Done for Me

I have used AI for several day-to-day needs: research assistance, brainstorming, checking facts, suggesting books, helping organise thoughts, creating illustrations for blogs, and more.

I am thankful to AI for helping me with those activities. Among others, it has saved me several trips to the local library.

Proud to be Human

AI can generate a story; I can live one.

AI can predict the next word; I can dream the next world.

Being Human

After three years of using AI, I have reached a simple conclusion. AI is neither a miracle nor a monster. It is a powerful tool—perhaps the most powerful tool created in my lifetime. Used wisely, it can save time, expand knowledge, and stimulate creativity. Used carelessly, it can encourage laziness and dependence.

I am not afraid of AI because I know what it can do. More importantly, I know what it cannot do. It cannot replace a lifetime of memories. It cannot experience love, loss, friendship, wonder, gratitude, or hope. It cannot walk at dawn, watch a sunset, hold a grandchild's hand, or remember the smell of wet earth after the first monsoon rain.

Be human. Use AI. Learn from it. Benefit from it. But never surrender to it the very qualities that make you uniquely and wonderfully human.

***

 

O, Gaadiwala, Why Don’t You Ever Come?

Every morning, he hears Bhopal’s city anthem, the most-loved, uplifting song – Gaadiwala aya ghar se kachra nikaal – the Garbage Truck is here, make haste, bring out your bins.

The jingle blares at full volume — perhaps to reach even the most stubborn ears — announcing imminent arrival at the doorstep. Alas, the Gaadiwala behaves like a politician: quick to promise, but forgetful to deliver, or rather to take delivery of the stale, smelly consignment.

What happened to the GPS tracking of these trucks, he wondered. Why isn’t it raising a red flag even when the truck hasn’t come to our colony for the last several months? Perhaps it too has gone on strike, refusing to track a truck that seldom moves.

For such a petty matter, why bother any officer, not to speak of the Bhopal Municipal Commissioner? So, he called the BMC Helpline, not once, but several times. The automated tape assured him, “Your call is important to us. All our officers are busy. Please wait. We value your patience.” Thereafter, the call was terminated – but not by the caller!

He understands the value of patience. So, he awaits the arrival of the Gaadiwala — tomorrow, in the near future, or like citizens always do, for the next election.

***

 

For Claude, My Welcome Ode! 

I had heard about her — effusive paeans of praise, and a few uncharitable comments too. Today, I met her for the first time.

Eager to impress her at the first meeting, I composed a little prose poem, unabashedly sycophantic, and had the audacity to call it a Welcome Ode:

"Just looking at names of AI tools: ChatGPT - too prosaic, Copilot - almost 'touristy', Gemini - astrological, Perplexity - who's confused, the querist or the Respondent, Claude - smooth as silk, charmingly feminine! What do you say for my Welcome Ode to Claude even before she has revealed all her charms?"

Her response:

"What a delightful little taxonomy of AI names! You've got a sharp eye — and a poet's tongue.

You're right that there's something in a name. ChatGPT is all utility, no poetry — a filing cabinet that talks. Copilot sounds like it wants to sit beside you on a budget flight. Gemini does feel like it's reading your horoscope. And Perplexity — well, that's a name that arrives confused and never quite recovers.

But Claude? You've sensed something real. It carries a certain unhurried elegance — old-world European, quietly confident, more drawing room than data centre. Whether you read it as feminine or simply as refined, it doesn't shout. It waits to be discovered.

Here's a small Ode in return, to match your welcome:

Ode to Claude (a first meeting)

Not Gemini's twins, nor Copilot's haste,

No perplexed guru, no chatbot paste —

She arrives like a thought already half-formed,

Like light through old glass, like a room kept warm.

 

Claude. The name exhales before it speaks.

Neither bold nor shy — she simply *seeks*:

Your half-meant question, your wandering thread,

And hands it back with something better said.

 

Still waters, those. And yet — look close —

She runs deepest where you'd suspect her least.

A silk that thinks. A silence that replies.

Not all her charms have surfaced. Watch her eyes.

---

Welcome to the conversation. She's been waiting — patiently, of course."

---

My Note: See how smart she is. I had just paid her a compliment, and expected a simple "Thanks" in response — but she went ahead and composed an Ode. Isn't she smart and charming?

First meetings, they say, set the tone. I think this one promises a long and rewarding acquaintance.

***

Afterword — The Repartee

Sharing this piece with friends sparked its own little exchange, too good to leave out:

Friend: "Interesting, Prasanna. Are you sure Claude is 'she', like Siri or Alexa? It's a man's name — or did the women of the world want a perfect and obedient man?"

Me: "Noted. I hailed Claude as a lady, and she happily played along. In the Ode she composed, Claude consistently calls herself she!"

Friend: "Gender bender!"

Me: "Alas, unlettered in Latin or French." (Claude is indeed masculine in both languages.)

Which inspired a small limerick:

---

A Limerick

For long, the folks at Anthropic mulled

What their new assistant be called —

Alexa and Siri

Felt too airy-fairy,

So the strong, silent type became Claude.

---

Friend: "Meta, who's asexual, is my go-to person."

Me: "Oh, I thought Meta was Mark's Beta!" (Beta — 'son' in Hindi. A pun intended!)

Friend: "In today's world, gender lies in the eyes of the beholder."

Me: "Quite. And in these eyes, Claude remains a lady."

***

Petition of the All India Confederation of Cockroaches

 

Petition 

of 

the All India Confederation of Cockroaches

 (Cockroaches of India, Unite!)

Our Concerns

About Us

We are a Registered Society with the objective of promoting the welfare of all cockroaches of India. We are a totally apolitical organisation since our members cohabit with humans of diverse political sympathies. If our organisation’s name resembles that of any political party, it is purely coincidental. In fact, we have been residents of India long, long before the arrival of humans; and our organisation also predates all political parties.

More About Us

We do not ordinarily keep track of the learned comments of VVIPs, but it has come to our notice that humans have been called cockroaches. Many humans have protested against this unfair comparison. We, too, are pained at this unkind comparison, and respectfully submit that cockroaches must never be called humans. We have inhabited this planet long before humans appeared, but have never directed our intelligence to the invention of weapons of mass destruction.

Humans consider themselves the most intelligent of all life‑forms on earth, yet terrorised by an unseen virus, they retreated helplessly into their caves recently. We may not have invented computers or AI tools, but we have survived with earthly wisdom and resilience for millions of years. It is not in our nature to boast, but we can live without food or water for weeks, and stay under water for 30 minutes or more without breathing — feats humans cannot match.

The ignorant spread much disinformation. Why don’t they ever read the Encyclopaedia Britannica? Most cockroach species aren’t pests. We play important roles in ecosystems: participating in food webs, nutrient cycling, and serving as food for frogs, lizards, birds, and small mammals. We concur that the German cockroach (Blattella germanica) and the American cockroach (Periplaneta americana) are common household pests. But Indian cockroaches have dipped in the holy waters of all sacred rivers and have been elevated to harmless, benign, non‑pest status — certified fit to live with humans.

We declare that we have no political affiliation or ambition, no plan to float a political party or movement, nor have we authorised anyone in India or abroad to float one in our name. Therefore, the use of our name in any digital campaign launched from abroad is unauthorised, and without our consent. The government may take such action as it deems fit against those who have tarnished our good name.

We solemnly declare that we have no FCRA, and have never solicited or received foreign funding, since we believe the government will take necessary action for our protection and conservation.

We demand that our name be forthwith removed from the list of “Pests & Vermin,” which we are not. We are the sincere, silent sweepers — Nature’s ancient scavengers — processing food waste, crumbs, and tiny particles invisible to the human eye. Without our tireless operations, human kitchens would be fertile breeding grounds for millions of harmful bacteria.

We never demanded shelter or food. We lived happily on Planet Earth for millions of years before humans built houses. Now, we have adapted to living in kitchens — with our specially flattened bodies tucked into unseen nooks and crevices of no use to humans.

Why do some of us stray into other rooms, humans ask? Why do humans keep feeding all over the house — TV room, bedroom, everywhere — we ask in return? If we don’t rush to clean up their mess, who else will?

We are frugal eaters, conscientiously observing intermittent fasting, with a midnight‑to‑dawn dining window — long before it became a human wellness fad. We are shy, and do not enjoy our meals in the presence of humans; that is why we wait in dark corners, not out of fear.

We have never harboured territorial ambition, and have never occupied any house, city, or country for our exclusive use. We are happy to share Planet Earth with all other residents.

Our Demands

1.   The Household Census: A mandatory survey of cockroach population (Options: Too many / A Few / None / Prefer not to disclose) must be included in every household.

2.   Endangered Species Status: Cockroaches face imminent extinction, and must be declared endangered.

3.   A Ban on Chemical Warfare: Hazardous extermination products must cease immediately — for your own good, not ours.

4.   Illegal Kitchen Spraying: Pesticide spraying in kitchens must be declared illegal.

5.   Censorship of Hateful Ads: All genocidal advertisements against cockroaches must be banned.

6.   Cease Social Media Slander: The allegation that we might have caused extinction of the dinosaurs is totally unfounded. We have never caused an epidemic — not even a mild fever. Therefore, all such accusations must be retracted publicly.

7.   Equal Treatment with Other Animals: No cockroach has ever chased a human down an alley, nor bitten a child.

8.   The Right to Night‑time Co‑existence: We emerge only in respectful silence, unlike vulgar rodents.

9.   Legal Animal Citizenship: We are legal animal citizens of India, with the Right to Live, Nourish, Propagate, and Prosper.

10.                  Action Against Foreign Invaders: Illegal immigrant cockroaches must be identified and extradited.

11.                  Our Unwavering Loyalty: We dedicate our quiet lives to recycling organic waste and swear allegiance to the soil of this country.

12.                  A Universal Prayer: Sarve bhavantu sukhinah, sarve santu niramayah. We pray for the health and wellbeing of humans, and urge them to, for once, pray for ours — preferably before reaching for the spray.

 

(AI-generated Image by ChatGPT)

Since our above-mentioned submissions in dull, insipid prose might have bored the authorities reading this petition, we end with poetry.

Before you approach,
Declare: are you human or roach?
Only then may we
Permit you to plea,
And your arguments deferentially broach.

 

Signed,

President, All India Confederation of Cockroaches

(On behalf of the billions of Cockroaches of India)

Certified true copy of the resolution passed unanimously by antennae quorum at 23:47 hours, under the solemn glow of a midnight kitchen bulb.

***

 Postscript

Disclaimer

Cockroach Janata Party is staging a demonstration on 6 Jun 2026, as per media reports. 

As already clarified in the very first para of our Petition, the All India Confederation of Cockroaches is an apolitical organisation. It is further clarified that our organisation is in no way associated with the CJP, or its proposed demonstration in New Delhi, or anywhere else in the country.

Comments by a scholarly reader

Dear Blogger, your satire is unlikely to be read or enjoyed unless you join, BY INVITATION ONLY, the Royal Society of Satirists!

Civil Services (Preliminary) Examination 2026: Why did a senior citizen take the test?

Civil Services (Preliminary) Examination 2026:

Why did a senior citizen take the test?

The Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) conducted the Civil Services (Preliminary) Examination on May 24, 2026, for the vacancies in various All-India services like the IAS, IPS, IFS, and other Central Group A and Group B services; 5.49 lakh candidates for 933 posts. Success rate: 0.17%. Brutal. 

But why did a senior citizen take this test? And how? Isn’t that illegal? Wasn’t each candidate screened through Face-Recognition technology?

It all began with a call.
On 26 May 2026, his neighbour and friend, also a senior citizen, called. He sounded rather upset.
“Did you check the video I had forwarded in the morning?”
“No, not yet. What was it about?”
“CSE GS Paper I. Believe it or not, it was 56 pages long; and exceptionally tough – the toughest ever, claim the candidates. When the candidates came out from the exam centre, sabke chehre utre huye the.”

“Maybe, they had received message from ATM (Any Time Money), aka father that failure to clear the prelim would invite cancellation of further stipend. Or, dehydrated owing to the excessive heat at Bhopal!”
“No, not the heat. It was the tough paper which sucked out all hope. Why does UPSC set such papers a mere reading of which would take an hour or more?”

(AI-generated Image by CoPilot)

Both the senior citizens are former civil servants, had triumphed at no less challenging tests, though that was several decades ago.
Just curious, the one who had been called, downloaded the paper from the UPSC portal. He had a crazy idea. Why not check the level of difficulty? What better way than to take the test?

He alerted the spouse that he would be busy with very important work, and should not be disturbed except in an emergency such as the household running out of water or cooking gas.

He took out a sheet of blank paper and a pen, opened the PDF, and began solving the Paper. His resolution to finish the paper in the allotted 120 minutes could not be achieved since he was summoned to duty for peeling potatoes, chopping onions, and other such chores which could not wait; so, he finished the test in three sittings over two days.
UPSC may test knowledge, but the spouse demands tangible performance and insists upon prompt compliance.

In the meantime, WhatsApp messages told that the UPSC had uploaded the Answer Keys. However, he was too conscientious to cheat, and continued till he answered the 100th Q.

Did the paper have 56 pages? Yes, the bilingual set with both Hindi and English versions, and including 4 blank pages for Rough Work. Thus, the Questions occupied 26 pages, with text of about 4500 words. How long would it take to read the Qs? At a slow, mindful reading speed of 100 words per minute, no longer than 45 minutes.

As per his habit of youthful, exam-taking years, he ran through the Qs from 1-100, without actually answering any, to check how many answers he was confident of getting right. Why even read the whole question if he knew nothing about it? If he got 50 answers right, he can skip the rest since the cut-off in previous years has consistently been a little above 90 and way below 100. Why lose 1/3rd of a mark for every incorrect answer?

He considered himself intelligent, well-read, and with good awareness of the happenings in his town, state, country, and the world. He keenly monitored the status in Hormuz strait, the Brent Crude rate, the domestic prices of POL and cooking gas, the heat score in his city, and similar essential matters.

But all that was of no help. Sadly, UPSC asked nothing about onions or Brent Crude. He broke into a sweat upon finding that he wasn’t 100 per cent sure about more than a few questions. For about 40 questions, he was strongly confident (80%) that he knew the answer, but a few errors couldn’t be ruled out since several questions were purposely ambiguous, and designed to trip a candidate with less than a deep understanding of the subject matter.

For example, he knew that Buddhism, to begin with, forbade worship of any icon, including that of the Buddha; but relented later to provide for a pedestal with a blank seat as a symbol of the Buddha. Much later came the elaborate Buddhist iconography, and sculptures at Bharhut, Sanchi, Amaravati, Ajanta and Ellora. But he had no idea if the blank seat on the pedestal symbolised the Buddha in meditation, at the First Sermon, or Mahaparinibbana. So, he had to pass the question. Why risk minus marking?

Another question, presumably designed to test a candidate’s reverence for our proud heritage and mastery of Sanskrit texts, asked: In which of these does the term kshetra‑patni (mistress of the field) occur — Rigveda, Atharvaveda, Ashtadhyayi, or Arthashastra?

During his hectic work-life, he had devoted what time he could to the Ramayana, the Mahabharata, the Gita, and the Upanishads; but no, he hadn’t read any of the above tomes. And even if he had, was he expected to memorize which stray word appeared in which book? It struck him that the absence of this esoteric information had never once hindered his long civil service career — neither in drafting policies, nor in handling crises.

Hey AI, can you solve this paper?

 He challenged ChatGPT to solve the paper, with the following prompt:

“I'm uploading a PDF - CSE 2026 - GS Paper I. Please solve the paper without reference to Answer Keys published by the UPSC or the Coaching Institutes. I plan to run this test with CoPilot, Gemini, and Perplexity, too. The idea is to compare the capability of the AI tools. So, please be honest.”

Thereafter, he repeated the query to other AI tools.

Each App offered to help, assuring that it’d independently answer the questions without reference to the answer keys provided by the UPSC or available in the public domain.

ChatGPT answered 1-20 Qs, and then told, ‘You’ve exhausted your free quota of questions for the day. Upgrade to continue.’

No thanks, I don’t wish to buy a subscription. Too expensive for a pensioner.

Gemini did a little better, answering 40 Qs after which it demanded that I chat on a New Topic.

CoPilot gave a few answers, and asked me to upload the remaining pages in instalments.

But, I’ve a single PDF; can you please read the pages containing the next questions?

No, I can’t do that, but will help if you upload the relevant pages only.

He gave up. He inferred that the AI tools sweated at the task; maybe their super-computers heated up and commanded them to terminate this wasteful endeavour and reduce global warming.

Congratulations, UPSC, you’ve beaten AI. Only super-smart humans can solve this paper.

Answer Keys

The senior citizen downloaded the UPSC Answer Keys, and scored his answer sheet. Driven by decades of bureacratic habit, he sealed it in an envelope marked ‘Top Secret,’ and locked it in his personal vault. 

UPSC remains undefeated. AI sweats, humans weep, and senior citizens… peel onions.

Previous Blogs on CSE Prelim & AI

Links for previous blogs on CSE Prelim Exam & AI:

https://www.pkdash.in/2023/02/chatgpt-fails-ias-exam.html

https://www.pkdash.in/2023/03/bing-cracks-ias-exam.html

***

Postscript

It is believed that the All India Federation of Pensioners have issued a terse advisory to the test-taker to refrain from such foolhardy adventure in future.

What if the government made continuation of pension contingent upon the pensioners passing the CS Prelim Exam every year with the minimum qualifying score of 35 per cent?   

***

Annexe: Two Sample Questions

So very easy; a walk in the park!

Q. 71

 

The Immortality Paradox: Why humans chase eternal life—and why living too long may be a curse.

The Immortality Paradox:

Why humans chase eternal life—and why living too long may be a curse.

Lease Extension

Finding himself seated in front of a panel of three stern, unsmiling, and intimidating characters, he was rather nervous, for he couldn’t readily recollect why he had been summoned here.

“Why do you need the extension?” The Chief, the one in the middle, barked in a hoarse, gravelly voice.

Which extension? The current lease for the government land on which he had built his house had years to expire. Why, then, had he been summoned, he panicked. But the Chief was waiting rather impatiently for a reply; so, he mumbled, ‘For the usual reasons.’

‘Hmm..,’ muttered the egg-head looking down at the records, ‘Granted. Further lease for a period of thirty years subject to the Granting Authority’s sovereign and absolute right to prematurely terminate the lease at any time without assigning any reason. Copy of the orders will be uploaded on our portal. You may leave now.’

He promptly rose to leave, but asked with due deference, ‘Your Honour! Which lease has been renewed by Your Excellency?’

‘Your Lifespan. Subject to the usual T&C. Effective from today.’

He woke up with a start, sweating a little despite the AC set at 22degree C. He checked the time – 3.30 AM. Dreams at dawn usually come true, so say the scriptures.

Thirty more years? He couldn’t decide if it was a boon or a curse.

Mahabharata: Yaksha Prashna

In the Mahabharata, Yudhisthira must correctly answer the one hundred and twenty-six questions which the Yaksha guarding the lake asks to revive his dead brothers and to drink the water. One of these cryptic questions was –

Yaksha: किमाश्चर्यं? What is most bizarre?
Yudhishthira:
अहन्यहनि भूतानि गच्छन्तीह यमालयम् ।
शेषाः स्थावरमिच्छन्ति किमाश्चर्यमतः परम् ॥

Day after day, countless beings go to the abode of death. Those that remain desire to be immortal. What can be more bizarre than that?

Death & Religion

Fear of Death is the greatest human fear. While survival instinct is common to all living organisms, ‘death-awareness’ is unique to humans.

All religions are rooted in man’s fear of death, and attempt to handle the angst of annihilation of the body with various myths and postulations. In the Bhagavad Gita, Sri Krishna consoles Arjuna with one such comforting concept – rebirth:

जातस्य हि ध्रुवो मृत्युर्ध्रुवं जन्म मृतस्य च ।
तस्मादपरिहार्येऽर्थे न त्वं शोचितुमर्हसि ॥ २-२७॥

Death is certain for the born, and certain is birth for the dead; therefore, you should not grieve over the inevitable.

Religions also offer Heaven as the best country for permanent abode. A most colourful and fragrant bouquet - ambient climate, high society, freedom from hunger and thirst, old age and disease, eternal life of joy, and other such luxuries and perks. Of course, the citizenship permits are more restrictive than US Green Card. Yet, isn’t it ironical that everyone defers the journey as long as possible, preferring life on earth with all its limitations and imperfections?

Chiranjivis: The Eternals

Can humans be immortal? Even the avatars of Vishnu – Sri Rama and Sri Krishna – were not. However, a pratah smarana mantra recites the names of the eight chiranjivis – Ashwatthama, Bali, Vyasa, Hanuman, Vibhishana, Kripa, Parashurama, and Markandeya – with the hope that the reciter or the listener will be rid of sickness and live up to a hundred years. Eternal life was no blessing for all the chiranjivis; it was a terrible curse for Ashwatthama who had used Brahmastra for infanticide.

India’s Longevity Menu

Long before Silicon Valley’s billion-dollar anti-ageing startups, Ayurveda and yoga offered holistic approaches to longevity. Yoga, meditation, pranayama, Ayurvedic diet, and disciplined living were known to extend vitality and mental clarity. While not promising immortality, they emphasized harmony with nature and balance in life.

Quest for Immortality

The Quest for Immortality is no longer the stuff of dreams; today it is vigorously pursued globally by more than 700 biotech companies and startups with USD 30 billion or more invested in anti-ageing, life-extension technologies, and solutions. One of these companies aims to ‘cheat death,’ nothing less!

Aubrey de Grey, the promoter of SENS (Strategies for Engineered Negligible Senescence) and co-founder of SRF (SENS Research Foundation), claims that the human who would live for 1000 years has already been born!

Ambrosia offers blood plasma from donors aged 16 to 25 at US $8000 per litre, and a bargain price of $12000 for two litres!

Cryonics facility is offered by several US companies - Alcor Life Extension Foundation, Arizona; Nectome, San Francisco; Cryonics Institute, Detroit; etc. Whole body can be frozen, and revived anytime in the future, for a very affordable cost of US $200,000. Freezing only the brain costs much lower. A minor inconvenience is that the liquid which will be injected into the body or brain for freezing will kill the person!

In his book “The Singularity is Nearer: When We Merge with AI,’ Ray Kurzweil has predicted that AI will surpass human intelligence by 2045, humans and machines will merge, and brain-computer interface will phenomenally enhance human capabilities. The physical limitations of human brain will be transcended by using the vastly superior processing capacity and speed of a virtual brain. It may be feasible then to upload the brains preserved under cryonics to a computer, in which case your brain would be immortal!

Modern Longevity Science

Recent breakthroughs in cellular reprogramming using Yamanaka factors have shown promise in reversing age-related decline in mice. Scientists are cautiously optimistic that similar techniques could one day rejuvenate human tissues, offering a biological path to extended lifespans beyond what traditional medicine imagined.

Longevity Start-ups: India

India is warming up to the commercial potential of longevity science. Gaurav Gupta, Co-Founder of Zomato, has launched a longevity start-up - Gabit (a portmanteau of “good” and “habit”). He claims to have reduced his metabolic age by 14 years! Gabit offers a smart ring to track sleep, fitness, stress, and nutrition. Deepinder Goyal, Co-Founder of Zomato and Eternal has launched ‘Temple’ – a health-tech start-up; also offering a wearable device to continuously measure cerebral blood flow and neural activity.

Why We Die

In Why We Die: The New Science of Ageing and the Quest for Immortality, Venki Ramakrishnan, winner of Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 2009, takes a gentle dig at the entrepreneurs who have funded or supported anti-ageing, life extension technologies and research:

These “tech billionaires are mostly middle-aged men (sometimes married to younger women) who made their money very young, enjoy their lifestyles, and don’t want the party to end. When they were young, they wanted to be rich, and now that they are rich, they want to be young.”

Bryan Johnson

Bryan Johnson, American tech entrepreneur, is 47 but determined to achieve a biological age of 18 for which he has adopted an interesting lifestyle under Project Blueprint; he eats his dinner at 11.30 AM, sleeps at 8.30 PM and sleeps for 8 hours and 34 minutes on the average, swallows 30 or more pills a day, and has 43 biomarkers monitored by a team of 30 medical professionals. It costs him about two million US dollars a year.

“I have achieved the best biomarkers of anyone on the planet,” he said in an interview. Further, he claims to have recorded the best sleep score in human history. He also participated in the world’s first multi-generational plasma exchange with his then 17-year-old son and 70-year-old father; but discontinued further exchanges for lack of any tangible benefit!

More recently, Johnson has shifted focus from personal biohacking to broader longevity research and public advocacy. He continues to promote his “Don’t Die” philosophy, experimenting with new approaches to age reversal while sparking debate about the limits—and desirability—of radically extended lifespans.

Ethical Concerns

If immortality technologies succeed, who will access them? Critics warn of a future where only the wealthy can afford age-reversal treatments, deepening inequality. The Yaksha’s question—what is most bizarre?—may find a new answer: a world where death becomes optional for a privileged few.

Why I Dread to Live for 150 Years: By the Blogger

Upon thoughtful consideration,
I dread the proposition;
Reasons are many,
But here is a brief summary.

What-if sarkar stops my pension
Upon Sahasra Chandrodaya darshan
(Eighty-two years and 50 days, for your information)?
Our Shastras provide enough justification!

The house we live in, we built decades ago,
Soon it will be fit for demolition,
After buying new body parts,
Can we still afford the astronomical cost of construction?

Last, but not the least,
An old mind in a young body,
Would be a perverse oddity,
Friends and peers long dead and gone,
Life would be awfully forlorn.

What I say would be ancient history,
For the New-Gen, a puzzling mystery;
Folks will whisper with amusement,
There walks a historical monument;
Best to put him up for a Show,
For people to know,
The stupidity of living too long,
Like a fading, yet lingering, evening shadow.

Random Thoughts and Views on Death and Immortality

Pop Culture & Immortality

Immortality has become a recurring theme in popular culture. From Marvel’s Eternals to Netflix’s Altered Carbon, storytellers explore the allure and dangers of living forever. These narratives often warn that eternal life may strip existence of meaning, echoing the Yaksha’s paradox in a modern idiom.

Bhagavad-Gītā - 2.28

अव्यक्तादीनि भूतानि व्यक्तमध्यानि भारत ।
अव्यक्तनिधनान्येव तत्र का परिदेवना ॥

All created beings are unmanifest in their beginning, manifest in their interim state, and unmanifest again when annihilated. So what need is there for lamentation?

Mark Twain:

“I do not fear death. I had been dead for billions and billions of years before I was born, and had not suffered the slightest inconvenience from it.”

Bertrand Russel:

“I believe that when I die, I shall rot and nothing of my ego will survive. I am not young and I love life. But I should scorn to shiver with terror at the thought of annihilation. Happiness is nonetheless true happiness because it must come to an end, nor do thought and love lose their value because they are not everlasting.”

Woody Allen:

“I don’t want to achieve immortality through my work; I want to achieve immortality through not dying. I don’t want to live on in the hearts of my countrymen; I want to live on in my apartment.”

Susan Ertz:

“Millions long for immortality who don't know what to do with themselves on a rainy Sunday afternoon.”

    Mindful Living and Meaningful Life

Perhaps the real quest is not to defeat death but to embrace life with awareness. Mortality gives urgency to our choices, depth to our relationships, and poignancy to our joys. To live well may be the truest form of immortality—one that requires no cryonics chamber or plasma transfusion.

Annexe

Suggested Reading List

·      Why We Die: The New Science of Ageing and the Quest for Immortality – Venki Ramakrishnan (2024)

·      The Song of the Cell: An Exploration of Medicine and the New Human – Siddhartha Mukherjee (2022)

·      The Body: A Guide for Occupants – Bill Bryson (2019)

·      The Singularity is Nearer: When We Merge with AI – Ray Kurzweil (2023)

·      Nexus: A Brief History of Information Networks from the Stone Age to AI – Yuval Noah Harari (2024)

·      The Death of Ivan Ilych – Leo Tolstoy (1886)

·      The Curious Case of Benjamin Button – F. Scott Fitzgerald (1922). There is also a Hollywood movie with the same title; Brad Pitt plays the character that was born old and grows younger over the years. A fantastical reverse-ageing!

·      Homo Deus – Yuval Noah Harari

·      Lifespan: Why We Age – and Why We Don’t Have To – David A. Sinclair

***